Application module: Event | ISO/TS 10303-1064:2018-11(E) © ISO |
NOTE This clause provides guidance about the tracking of planned and actual dates of events. Although the mentioned entity data types are defined in the ARM, the recommendations also apply with the MIM entity data types.
There are two ways to use the Event entity to record the actual occurrence of a planned event:
Interpretations of various usages of Event are given in the table below. The first column shows whether there is a planned_start_date set, the second whether there is an actual_start_date, the third shows whether there is at least an actual event which is related with an instance of Event_relationship with relation_type = "actualization". The last column provides an interpretation of the instantiation case.
NOTE Interpretation of instances of Event_relationship whose relation_type is not 'actualization' is not considered nor impacted by the following table.
Table F.1 — Interpretation of instances of Event_relationship with relation_type 'actualization'.
planned start date |
actual start date |
related actual event |
interpretation |
---|---|---|---|
no | no | no | a description of a type of event, with nothing said about its possible or actual occurrence |
no | no | yes | may be used to describe a generic event and its actual occurrences |
no | yes | no | actual, or considered as such, event |
no | yes | yes | an actual event that has one or more actual events. Not recommended because meaningless |
yes | no | no | a planned event for which no actual occurrence has been recorded |
yes | no | yes | a planned event for which one or more actual occurrences have been recorded |
yes | yes | no | an event for which it was not considered necessary to record planned date and actual date in distinct related instances of Event |
yes | yes | yes | mixed approach to represent planned and actual events. Not recommended |
© ISO 2018 — All rights reserved